31 May 2012
morning, but had the wind knocked out of the sails after some sluggish
economic data from south of the border. The ADP private payrolls report
showed a 133,000 gain in employment this month, slightly less than
forecasts. Jobless claims ticked higher, while the Chicago-area
manufacturing index unexpectedly slipped to 52.7. Finally, US first-quarter
GDP growth was revised lower to 1.9%, although the revision was expected.
The Canadian banks are propping up the TSX this morning after both CIBC and
National bank reporting better than forecast profits, with National Bank
raising its quarterly dividend. Still that won't stop the index, along with
most world market averages, from posting its worst monthly performance since
last September. The TSX is down 43 pts. The Dow is down 96 pts.
The Canadian dollar is down another half cent this morning to US$.9661. Bond
yields continue to sink with the 5-year Canada yield now down to 1.22% and
the 10-year to 1.72%. Oil is off $1.19 to US$86.63/barrel. Gold is up $4 to
Regional Vice President, Western Ontario Radius Financial
29 May 2012
17 May 2012
14 May 2012
Government of Canada Supports Angel Investors in Southern Ontario
For immediate release
May 14, 2012
Oakville, Ontario — Terence Young, Member of Parliament for Oakville, on behalf of the Honourable Gary Goodyear, Minister of State for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario), today announced a new Government of Canada investment for Angel One Investor Network that will help the organization connect more angel investors with promising new businesses in the region.
"The Government of Canada is committed to creating jobs, growth and long-term prosperity for southern Ontario," said MP Young. "By helping encourage greater angel investment in the innovations of entrepreneurs in our region, we are strengthening relationships between start-up companies, investors and our government, and equipping businesses with the tools they need to succeed. This will help drive innovation in southern Ontario, for the benefit of our people, businesses and communities."
Angel One Investor Network is a not-for-profit angel network based in Oakville, Ontario. The group aims to develop a strong base of active angel investors to respond to the funding needs of early-stage, entrepreneurial companies in the Oakville, Burlington and Hamilton areas that are working to commercialize innovative technologies.
Under FedDev Ontario's Investing in Business Innovation initiative, Angel One Investor Network will receive up to $50,000 to expand its membership base and increase its pool of angel investors through outreach activities such as recruiting and training seminars, a web site and other promotional tools. The group is aiming to increase its investor group from the current 11 members to a total of 40 members.
"The introduction of a formal angel organization in the region is expanding the investing breadth and depth of the local investors. Angel investing has become an important component in the effective commercialization of innovation," said Karen Grant, executive director of Angel One Investor Network. "Individually and in groups Angel investors fund at least $1.9 billion a year in Canada, complementing the $871 million invested by venture capital in early-stage companies."
Created in 2009, FedDev Ontario supports the southern Ontario economy by building on the region's strengths and creating opportunities for jobs and economic growth. The Agency has launched a number of initiatives to create a Southern Ontario Advantage and place the region in a strong position to compete in the global economy. These initiatives are designed to encourage partnerships and support projects that help the region's businesses and communities become more competitive, innovative and diversified. To learn more, please visit www.feddevontario.gc.ca or call 1-866-593-5505.
Follow us on Twitter @FedDevOntario
– 30 –
For more information, contact:
Director of Communications
Office of the Honourable Gary Goodyear
Want to buy a cottage? Weigh the costs versus the rewards
Jason Heath May 5, 2012 – 7:00 AM ET | Last Updated: May 7, 2012 9:49 AM ET
Is a vacation property affordable without stretching yourself too thin and sacrificing other financial goals?
May marks a time of change for those who own or who wish to own a vacation property. The snowbirds are returning from the sunny south and the Victoria Day holiday has historically been “opening weekend” for many cottagers. It is also a time of year that sees a lot of turnover of vacation properties — whether north or south — which might make you wonder how you can achieve your dream of owning a vacation property.
Most people opt for cottages over homes or condos in the southern states simply because of proximity. The Royal LePage Recreational Property Report says standard waterfront recreational properties can range from the mid-$150s on the East Coast to approaching $1-million in Cranbrook or Vernon, B.C., the Muskoka region of Ontario or the Eastern Townships of Quebec.
For argument’s sake, assume the purchase of a $200,000 cottage. Not everybody has a couple of hundred thousand dollars waiting to find a home (pun intended), so most cottage purchases will be financed. It’s important to know ahead of time that mortgages for recreational properties may be subject to different lending requirements and higher interest rates than your home. Banks tend to look more favourably upon cottages that have year-round access and are winterized when determining acceptable loan-to-value ratios and discounts off of posted mortgage interest rates, so don’t count on standard mortgage terms for an uninsulated log home on an island.
If someone qualifies for an 80% mortgage on their notional $200,000 cottage, that requires a down payment of $40,000. It’s possible (though may or may not be advisable) to borrow against your principal residence for this down payment. Assuming a 4% rate and a 25-year amortization on the $160,000 mortgage, the monthly payments would be $842, which is about $10,000 a year. Property taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance might conservatively add another $5,000 a year, meaning a total annual cost of $15,000 (7.5% of the cottage purchase price). Assuming the entire down payment came from a secured line of credit on your home, add another $2,000 in interest-only payments at a minimum at today’s rates. Remember, though, in addition, cottages need new roofs and experience other expensive and unexpected maintenance requirements just like a home. And interest rates have nowhere to go but up.
It wouldn’t be unreasonable for a family of four to spend $5,000 to go on a one-week vacation, but that’s a long way from the $15,000 carrying costs for the cottage. That said, in this example, nearly $4,000 a year would be going to mortgage principle repayments and if the cottage rises in value at a modest 3% a year, there’s another $6,000 in net equity — $10,000 in total — over the course of the year. If we knock $10,000 off the carrying costs, a family might be looking at only a $5,000 annual net “cost,” which is getting a bit more reasonable when you look at it this way.
There is still a valid argument that the average family who might only take a couple weeks of vacation per year might do better to rent a cottage or visit an all-inclusive resort and spread out their vacation spending. A $5,000 vacation budget could go a long way and for those who like diversity, it might not be very rewarding to spend it all in one place at the cottage. But likewise, some would gladly add this to their budget to have a second home to call their own.
For those who like diversity, it might not be very rewarding to spend it all in one place at the cottage
One consideration when purchasing a cottage property is the potential to rent it out. It’s much easier to rent a cottage on your own these days on Kijiji or other online directories, by creating your own website or simply by word of mouth. But there are also property managers who will find tenants and provide various levels of management — typically for 10% to 20% of the rent collected. This can certainly help pay for some of the carrying costs and can be a good option for families who can’t spend much time at their cottage. It also makes some of the carrying costs tax-deductible (though the rent received is also taxable). Renting any property, cottage or otherwise, can present many unpleasant challenges for landlords, so renting is not without potential headaches.
More and more Canadians are looking south of the border for vacation properties. Florida, Arizona and California tend to be hot spots. With the decline in U.S. home prices, coupled with the increase in the Canadian dollar vis-à-vis the U.S. in recent years, home prices are very affordable in the U.S. on a relative basis compared to many places here in Canada.
Average home prices in Florida peaked around $271,985 in 2006 and have since stabilized around $159,900. This compares to the average home price in Canada of about $369,677.
If financing is required for a U.S. property, U.S. banks may lend 50% to 75% of the purchase price to a Canadian depending on the state. Lenders may also require the deposit of up to 12 months of mortgage payments, property taxes and insurance premiums into a U.S. bank account. Some people use a mortgage or line of credit on their Canadian home to provide the funds to purchase a U.S. property to keep things simple.
Canadians with a high net worth need to be cognizant of U.S. estate taxes, which could become payable on death for those owning U.S. assets. There is a lot of short-term uncertainty around U.S. estate tax rules, so be sure to consult a professional.
A Canadian who rents out a U.S. property will be required to file a U.S. tax return, although in most cases, little or no tax results and the filing is simply administrative.
Is a cottage or U.S. recreational property a good investment? That depends in part on what happens with real estate prices. Some have called for the bursting of a real estate bubble in Canada, suggesting caution for Canadian cottage buyers. Historically, Canadian homes have averaged about 3.5 times household income — currently, they stand at 4.75 times, which is quite a jump from the long-term trend. Meanwhile, the U.S. housing market, although it seems to have found a floor, has not shown much of an improvement to suggest positive returns in the near term.
Prices aside, because future real estate trends are just speculation, one needs to examine more tangible factors. Is a vacation property affordable without stretching yourself too thin and sacrificing other financial goals? Is diverting money otherwise spent on vacations to a fixed address a good trade-off? And finally, where do you and your family want to be — sitting on the dock this summer or baking on a beach next winter? Both sound good, but take the time to determine what’s right for you from both a financial and lifestyle perspective.
Jason Heath is a fee-only Certified Financial Planner (CFP) and income tax professional for Objective Financial Partners Inc. in Toronto.
Mortgage Alliance Oac Mortgages
We are legislated by the Ministry of Finance FSCO and our brokerage license is 10928.
We are dedicated to educating our clients about their mortgage! We want you to be well informed and comfortable with the mortgage you have and the options available to you. This blog is intended to offer information, updates, current mortgage products and current rates.
Please provide your feedback and let us know if there is anything else we can provide to help you in your mortgage process.